On this page: 1. Digging Deeper — 2. The Need for Education — 3. Specific Education — 4. Form of Education — 5. Roles — 6. Project Sizes — 7. World Regions —
8. Conclusions — 9. Comments — Appendix: The Method
Summary: 9 out of 10 practitioners in Project Business Management emphasized the need for domain-specific education, but only 1/3 said that he or she had received that.
Reference: Project Business Foundation (2018) Income Report: Customer vs. Internal Projects, June [Online]. Available from: https://www.project-business.org/research/report-education-for-pbm (Accessed: ## #### 202#).
What we already knew: In another study done in 08/2021, respondents reported a solid trend towards Project Business Management :
Now, we wanted to know more. A new study gave us insights into the state of education for Project Business Management.
We wanted to know, how well project managers are prepared for the Project Business job. The survey was performed with 534 participants between February 9 and March 3, 2022.
The first question related to the need for education of professionals in Project Business Management. Here is the result:
Nine out of ten respondents managing Project Business said, it requires specific education.
In the next question, we asked whether the project managers have recieved this education.
One out of three respondents said, that they had specific training in Project Business Management.
Two third of the respondents said, they had not much or no training at all for the job. The "No specific education" was actually the largest group of all.
Obviously, practitioners in Project Business Management are expected to learn by trial and error, but trial in Project Business is expensive, and error even more.
The following questions were voluntary.
This question had 514 responses:
Our next question referred to the preferred way of learning domain-specific knowldege.
The preferences were:
Note: Respondents could select multiple options.
Responses for this question: 502
We asked the respondents about their role in Project Business.
77.3% said, that they are in the role of a project manager either on customer or contractor side, or working for prime contractors.
Prime contractors are both contractors for the projects customer and buying from suvbcontractors.
The diagram shows the distribution of the responses to 3. (Have you received specific education?) for each of this group.
The lowest number of "yes" responses is in the group of prime contractors. This is concerning, because their employer is both a contractor (to the customer) and a customer (of subcontractors). This is the group for which education in Project Business Management should be most relevant and have the shortest payback period.
We also see freelance project managers with a low rate of education. This is expectable, as they have to self-pay their education instead of getting it sponsored by an employer.
This result shows that with increasing project size, our respondents reported a reduction in education for project business. Larger projects have more risks than smaller ones and tend to be more international, so this is a concerning result.
NB: Due to the small number of 10 responses, we left out the cohort with projects that have more than 10,000 people involved.
The survey adds knowledge on Project Business Management that was not available before:
Survey participants could leave a message. Here is what they told us.
This feels like a new frontier. My mgt is more interested in business than project management, always has been that way, and they get paid for developing business.
For several years I was PM from a Customer's side, now I am from a Contractor's side
Here in China, there is no education on project management. Things are worse when you do customer projects.
Very important to know the steps and how to accomplish your goal. Each project is different.
Project Business is not only about the project, it is also about the business. A magnific outstanding project can be an enormous failure from the business perspective, therefore business education is needed.
Governments business in construction for health care so most of the time it will be contracted out no in house capabilities. PMs, QA, are in house the rest is outsourced.
PM is a critical skill that is encouraged but not often not provide. It is an after hours effort by individuals.
Practical exposure helps and concepts can be applied to practical problems so it's a mix of both worlds. Only challenge is how we can get rid of diplomacy and political things.
Keep learning and keep educating
Interested to join in this research.
Any training course available for Project Business from an Academy?
The most useful education for project managers are through informal education (mentoring & coaching).
From a personal perspective it is important to somewhat formalize internal education towards formal education. PMI still offers a reputation here.
Some high level managers and leaders do not understand or value the importance of having project management skills and education for their employees and applying these skills.
Being involved/informed about purpose and expected outcomes of a project in early stages of discussion is critical and eliminates endless Initiation Phase meetings with possible stakeholders. To be selected as Program/Project Manager for global initiatives, after basic initial decisions, is wasteful. Provide the Project Charter and empower the PM, EARLY, for better clarity and results. This will certainly improve time-budget-schedule targets.
We wanted to know: What is the need for professional education in the discipline of Project Business Management, and do practitioners receive that?
So we asked practitioners from the field.
The survey platform was on Surveymonkey, where the original results are still accessible.
Questions 1 & 2:
For the first two forced choice questions (points 2 and 3 in this report), radio buttons were used that allowed selecting one answer. Answers to these two questions were mandatory to finish the tests. All following questions could be skipped.
Question 3:
The third question (point 4 in this report) related to prefered methods of conveying knowledge. This question was open choice, i.e. participants could use checkboxes to select several answers. The 514 respondents who answered this question selected on average 3.2 answers.
They also could add own recommendations. This additional option was used by 23 respondents, who mostly focused on employer-internal programs.
Questions 4 to 6:
These are described as points 5 to 7 in this report. The question type was again forced choice , allowing only one option. Here, we used drop-down fields to enable participants to answer these non-mandatory questions.
Additional fields:
Two additional fields allowed participants to leave an e-mail address so that we could inform them about the results and a free text field to add comments.
© 2020-23 Oliver F. Lehmann, Project Business Foundation
All rights reserved.
Project Business Foundation
c/o Oliver F. Lehmann, Trollblumenstr. 39g
80995 Munich, Germany
The Project Business Foundation is a brand of Oliver F. Lehmann, Munich, Germany
Impressum | The Project Business Foundation logo and the ACE logo are registered trademarks.