Summary: 9 out of 10 practitioners in Project Business Management emphasized the need for domain-specific education, but only 1/3 said that he or she had received that.
What we already knew: In another study done in 08/2021, respondents reported a solid trend towards Project Business Management :
Now, we wanted to know more. A new study gave us insights into the state of education for Project Business Management
We wanted to know, how well project managers are prepared for the Project Business job. The survey was performed with 534 participants between February 9 and March 3, 2022.
The first question related to the need for education of professionals in Project Business Management. Here is the result:
Nine out of ten respondents managing Project Business said, it requires specific education.
In the next question, we asked whether the project managers have recieved this education.
One out of three respondents said, that they had specific training in Project Business Management.
Two third of the respondents said, they had not much or no training at all for the job. The "No specific education" was actually the largest group of all.
Obviously, practitioners in Project Business Management are expected to learn by trial and error, but trial in Project Business is expensive, and error even more.
The following questions were volutary.
This question had 514 responses:
Our next question referred to the preferred way of learning domain-specific knowldege.
The preferences were:
Note: Respondents could select multiple options.
Responses for this question: 502
We asked the respondents about their role in Project Business.
77.3% said, that they are in the role of a project manager either on customer or contractor side, or working for prime contractors.
Prime contractors are both contractors for the projects customer and buying from suvbcontractors.
The diagram shows the distribution of the responses to 3. (Have you received specific education?) for each of this group.
The lowest number of "yes" responses is in the group of prime contractors. This is concerning, because their employer is both a contractor (to the customer) and a customer (of subcontractors). This is the group for which education in Project Business Management should be most relevant and have the shortest payback period.
We also see freelance project managers with a low rate of education. This is expectable, as they have to self-pay their education instead of getting it sponsored by an employer.
Responses for this question: 503
Another question related to project size, measured in number of people involved from start to finish.
The largest group among the respondents to the survey was involved with projects between 11 and 100 people.
This result shows that with increasing project size, our respondents reported a reduction in education for project business. Larger projects have more risks than smaller ones and tend to be more international, so this is a concerning result.
NB: Due to the small number of 10 responses, we left out the cohort with projects that have more than 10,000 people involved.
Responses for this question: 502:
We defined seven world regions and asked participants where they came from.
According to their responses, people from North America seemed to have the highest number of well-educated experts in Project Business Management. Middle East reported the smallest number.
NB: Due to the small number of 7 responses, we left out the cohort with projects from Australia/New Zealand.
The survey adds knowledge on Project Business Management that was not available before:
Survey participants could leave a message. Here is what they told us.
This feels like a new frontier. My mgt is more interested in business than project management, always has been that way, and they get paid for developing business.
For several years I was PM from a Customer's side, now I am from a Contractor's side
Here in China, there is no education on project management. Things are worse when you do customer projects.
Very important to know the steps and how to accomplish your goal. Each project is different.
Project Business is not only about the project, it is also about the business. A magnific outstanding project can be an enormous failure from the business perspective, therefore business education is needed.
Governments business in construction for health care so most of the time it will be contracted out no in house capabilities. PMs, QA, are in house the rest is outsourced.
PM is a critical skill that is encouraged but not often not provide. It is an after hours effort by individuals.
Adopting a Project Business outlook to projects requires a large set of skills that go es beyond what is actually tought in traditional PM trainings
Practical exposure helps and concepts can be applied to practical problems so it's a mix of both worlds. Only challenge is how we can get rid of diplomacy and political things.
Interesting topic. A lot to learn.
Keep learning and keep educating
Interested to join in this research.
Are there any certifications for this?
How to keep the contractors engaged after the project completion or hand-over to customer in order to ensure the business objective is achieved.
Continue your amazing work to educate people in project business. I am looking forward to more webinars.
From a personal perspective it is important to somewhat formalize internal education towards formal education. PMI still offers a reputation here.
Some high level managers and leaders do not understand or value the importance of having project management skills and education for their employees and applying these skills.
Being involved/informed about purpose and expected outcomes of a project in early stages of discussion is critical and eliminates endless Initiation Phase meetings with possible stakeholders. To be selected as Program/Project Manager for global initiatives, after basic initial decisions, is wasteful. Provide the Project Charter and empower the PM, EARLY, for better clarity and results. This will certainly improve time-budget-schedule targets.
I witness how the company goals and objectives are being confused and the actions to achieve them are modeled in a very complicated array obtaining undesirable results. The procedures and methods must be simple and tailored according to the company's goals, to do so, the relevant information and mentor has to be available to generate the model.
More awareness about project management is needed, most people confused with certification. Project management for success in life and business, certification for specific needs. Translation for non English speakers is helpful in understanding more material in different languages is essential.
Coaches and consultants are good for providing general guidance, but may not necessarily know the details of the business or specific factors that impact projects in a given business. I think an internal education or mentoring program would be best for a specific business, but may also contribute to groupthink.
Subcontractors are expected to be specialists, but we as project managers must work well with them to make them effective and obtaining good project results. Then we need to involve subcontractors from the very beginning of the project, even if they do not need to start their work immediately, but getting them engaged, involved and giving inputs and feedback.
I have an unusual background. I worked my way up from a trainee SE, to DBA, to lead, Development Mgr, VP, VP of Tech at 2 Fortune 500 companies. I got my PMP after I left my last job I found my background was not enough, I needed a PMP. I have been working as a developer and I noticed the PMPs I work with only want to report on status and know how long something will take. They do not get involved with any thing else. Back to your question: Role playing or actually working a project is invaluable. Second best - case studies. Third best - online turorials and learning like your podcast.
Project Management is no longer valued. Microsoft Project Server (Online, App, etc.) has killed themselves in the market and so that is no longer used. Pretty much only construction only cares about Project Management - because they track subs and progress and payments. Nobody cares about precision - which Project Management and Microsoft Project did well. Companies only now care about general accuracy - get the tasks done by Friday next week.
Who decides Project Governance and Project Methodology in Project Business Management? Many conflict arises for those 2 decisions between buyer and seller. What does Project Business Management recommend for solving disagreements on Methodology and Governance?
I work for an Indian IT services company in Germany, servicing German customers.
We need to standardise and align the various terms like project business, project economy, project management etc
I think that the ACE certification is little bit expensive for African countries.
Project Business needs to be promoted to larger stakeholder audience which would certainly help many Project Managers especially managing external projects on daily basis of their job profile.
I "come" with certification and Education. I believe each company/client has a different set of software and process in place which need to be communicated as a new project resource is added.
It may be the professional level of construction I work in (bottom of the pecking order from customer - general contractor - subcontractor), but it seems to have my PMP and my expectations of other project managers with/without a PMP certification that projects will perform better......and it's not the case. As far as PMP training, I had to do it on my own. I didn't have an employer who saw the value of having it. An now with a different employer who is glad I have it, the salary I make is equal to my coworker managers with no PMP certification.
I have been looking for Project Business education for many years but didn't know what to call it. Finally came across PM Podcast episode that led me to Project Business Foundation. Interested in learning more. I am PMO manager for our Services/Deployment division and looking to further our PM's education to provide better customer service to our clients.
Job descriptions which funnel people into a narrow dimension of project management especially in corporates are a problem. PMs lose the opportunity to expand their skill set horizontally across business functions related to project management. I have selected all answers to question 3 as I believe any opportunity to learn must be taken. The most effective would be the last two options in my opinion.
A significant part is in the project supply chain. The top teirs of the supply chain may be competent PMs, however this can reduce the further in to the supply chain you go. How can we address this? Also, there is a desire in several industries/regions for more collaboration, and specifically Collaborative contracting. I see this frequently with client to prime contractor, but becomes rare the further in to the supply chain. Can we do something about this?... Should we do something about this? (pros & cons) I could go on and on...
Navigating your employers financial goals and resource limitations while being asked to take on each customer project plus additional improvement initiatives is a often a daunting reality that the contractor PM needs to manage daily. There are often unrealistic expectations on both sides and lack of understanding on the complexities and number of tasks a PM has to juggle on a daily basis (that are really covered by what is being charged to the customer).
We wanted to know: What is the need for professional education in the fireld of Project Business Management, and do practitioners receive that?
So we asked practitioners from the field.
The survey was held globally and was open from 09 February to 03 March 2022. It was closed after 534 responses.
The survey platform was on Surveymonkey, where the original results are still accessible.
Questions 1 & 2:
For the first two forced choice questions (points 2 and 3 in this report), radio buttons were used that allowed selecting one answer. Answers to these two questions were mandatory to finish the tests. All following questions could be skipped.
The third question (point 4 in this report) related to prefered methods of conveying knowledge. This question was open choice, i.e. participants could use checkboxes to select several answers. The 514 respondents who answered this question selected on average 3.2 answers.
They also could add own recommendations. This additional option was used by 23 respondents, who mostly focused on employer-internal programs.
Questions 4 to 6:
These are described as points 5 to 7 in this report. The question type was again forced choice , allowing only one option. Here, we used drop-down fields to enable participants to answer these non-mandatory questions.
Two additional fields allowed participants to leave an e-mail address so that we could inform them about the results and a free text field to add comments.
The Project Business Foundation is an independent professional and industry association under Swiss Law (Zivilgesetzbuch, Art. 60-79)